|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Bait wrote: UPF wrote: Bait wrote: Welcome again Rushy  Even though your 3Dmark scores are low, how's it at playing games? Graphics Score 9586 take a wild guess. Hahaha yeah, but considering he's using a dual core I was curious if he gets any stutter or ****... Yea its great playing games. The only stutter ive found was within battlefield 3, in a mission where your in the planes, actually saw the planes going back and forth due to stutter. All settings maxed out
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:19 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
UPF wrote: nings wrote: Don't listen to UPF he has nothing worthwhile to say. You are telling him to waste hundreds of dollars because his 3Dmark score was gay... ***** please Yea im with UPF. I dont need to spend even more money. Graphics card was pricey enough....should of waited for the gtx 670. Then i could of upgraded the cpu,ram and motherboard
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:23 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
And I was thinking I had a CPU bottleneck. Your GPU is proberly running at 40-50% usage. Atleast you don't have to worry about it over heating. Enjoy that 
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:10 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Audi wrote: And I was thinking I had a CPU bottleneck. Your GPU is proberly running at 40-50% usage. Atleast you don't have to worry about it over heating. Enjoy that  I know the cpu bottles the graphics card, a bit. What do you mean "40-50% usage". Ive seen the usage monitor I have on my second display say that it goes to 90% GPU usage (Depending on game). No, it wont over heat ever. Made my own custom fan curve 
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:26 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
A mate had the same CPU and a 680 and was getting 50% usage in bf3 on ultra. He was getting about 40fps when he would have double that with a quad core CPU. Really dependant on the games you play... Anyway enjoy ya card dude.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:46 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Audi wrote: A mate had the same CPU and a 680 and was getting 50% usage in bf3 on ultra. He was getting about 40fps when he would have double that with a quad core CPU. Really dependant on the games you play... Anyway enjoy ya card dude. Ok, thats odd. For bf3 I had 60 fps on 3d mode on my monitor. Thats 60 fps on each eye
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:03 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
On 64p conquest? What grfx settings? A 680 with a quad core CPU would average about 70-80fps on ultra @1080p in MP and that's 2d.. Anyway enjoy ya setup.. I'm gonna stop derailin this thread...
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:19 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Audi wrote: On 64p conquest? What grfx settings? A 680 with a quad core CPU would average about 70-80fps on ultra @1080p in MP and that's 2d.. Anyway enjoy ya setup.. I'm gonna stop derailin this thread... No, on single player campaign. On ultra settings. 1920x1080 (1080p). Just checked...averages at 75-100 fps
|
| Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:48 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
This guy was bragging to me about his 670 and how it gets 90+ fps on crysis 2. Haha.
|
| Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:48 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
lol, no **** eh.. Maybe at 800x600 on low textures. Rusty I didn't even realise bf3 had single player.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Audi wrote: lol, no **** eh.. Maybe at 800x600 on low textures. Rusty I didn't even realise bf3 had single player. Its Rushy. Lol. Really Do you have the game?
|
| Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:16 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
Yep and in 64p multiplayer on ultra at 1080p with 2x 680 I avg 130fps as inf, heli 110fps and jets 150fps.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:18 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Audi wrote: Yep and in 64p multiplayer on ultra at 1080p with 2x 680 I avg 130fps as inf, heli 110fps and jets 150fps. Nice. That would be pretty pricey, 2 gtx 680's
|
| Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:01 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
Yeah, he had to ask the manager at maccas to pay him in advance.....
|
| Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:27 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 5th February, 2005 Posts: 489
|
Audi wrote: Yep and in 64p multiplayer on ultra at 1080p with 2x 680 I avg 130fps as inf, heli 110fps and jets 150fps. +1 im getting roughly the same with my GTX 680 SLI setup 
_________________ i7 2600k @4.6Ghz - corsair H80 - Asrock z68 extreme 4 gen3 - 16Gb G.Skill 2133Mhz ram - GTX 680 SLI - Corsair Force 3 120Gb SSD - WD Black Caviar 1Tb HDD - Coolermaster Stacker 830 Nvidia Edition - Toughpower 1200w psu - Samsung 23" 3D 120Hz S23A950D
|
| Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:53 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 5th February, 2005 Posts: 489
|
Circa wrote: Yeah, he had to ask the manager at maccas to pay him in advance..... i stole 2 macca's employees **** box cars and sold them to criminals to use as ram raid vehicles to pay for my GTX680's 
_________________ i7 2600k @4.6Ghz - corsair H80 - Asrock z68 extreme 4 gen3 - 16Gb G.Skill 2133Mhz ram - GTX 680 SLI - Corsair Force 3 120Gb SSD - WD Black Caviar 1Tb HDD - Coolermaster Stacker 830 Nvidia Edition - Toughpower 1200w psu - Samsung 23" 3D 120Hz S23A950D
|
| Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:00 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
lmao that works too
|
| Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:45 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 10th May, 2003 Posts: 771
|
My PC. Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 SLI 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident 3DMark11 Link
_________________
By way of deception, thou shalt do war.
|
| Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:51 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
Welcome to the ladder and great score Vukodlak  P15731 - Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 - 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident - SLI Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Stock
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:51 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 22nd March, 2012 Posts: 26
|
Vukodlak wrote: My PC. Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 SLI 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident 3DMark11 LinkNice score dude.
|
| Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:39 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 10th May, 2003 Posts: 771
|
GPUjoe wrote: Vukodlak wrote: My PC. Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 SLI 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident 3DMark11 LinkNice score dude. Looking for some advice on what to OC first to push it up higher. Not really any expansion room left on the MB now.
_________________
By way of deception, thou shalt do war.
|
| Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:35 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 14th May, 2005 Posts: 457
|
hello hope this links score of P9921 should be stock with an i7-3770K and a 680gtx http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4576244going to try using Easytune6 quickboost if thats an easy way to OC?
|
| Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:20 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
Welcome Fencer, great score mate! Forget Easyfail and use EVGA Precision X FTW....
P9921 - i7 3770k @ stock - Gigabyte GTX680 @ stock
PS: Also just a reminder to people, please submit score in the correct format thanks.
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:13 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 22nd March, 2012 Posts: 26
|
Vukodlak wrote: GPUjoe wrote: Vukodlak wrote: My PC. Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 SLI 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident 3DMark11 LinkNice score dude. Looking for some advice on what to OC first to push it up higher. Not really any expansion room left on the MB now. For starters what Cooling system are you running on that 3770k? they have a reputation for getting hot. You could definitely get your score higher if you clocked that CPU higher like about 4.5ghz+ and also if you are not using EVGA precision X to OC those cards use it, its definitely the best OC software for 600 series GPUs. Dont be scared of cooking the cards they just throttle back or the display driver will crash if you get too aggressive with your OC settings. Good luck and have fun.
|
| Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:54 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
And to add to Joe's instructions, be somewhat cautious with the VGA memory clocks, as it's not protected! So increase the memory clocks in small increments and test for artifacts, once it starts artifacting back it off atleast 10 Mhz for safety, because if you push the memory to hard you will kill it and brick your card...
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:09 am |
|
 |
|
GameOp
Joined: 15th February, 2004 Posts: 2765
|
IMO stay away from OCing memory. I generally find memory OCing is less robust than the gpu core OC and will rarely have significant real world benefit.
|
| Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:44 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 22nd March, 2012 Posts: 26
|
Gung-ho wrote: IMO stay away from OCing memory. I generally find memory OCing is less robust than the gpu core OC and will rarely have significant real world benefit. I agree with that in regards to the 500 series Nvidia cards but these 680s wont reach decent OCs unless you increase the memory clock along with the Core clock offset and power target.
|
| Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:29 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
GPUjoe wrote: I agree with that in regards to the 500 series Nvidia cards but these 680s wont reach decent OCs unless you increase the memory clock along with the Core clock offset and power target.
Nah I find I get better core overclocks when I don't touch the memory.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:32 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 29th October, 2007 Posts: 18
|
heres my score: p13480 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4922541system: re4,3930k @4400,sli580gtx dcu11 @897mhz,16gb ripgaw z,xspc case, lcs thanx:)
_________________ Asus Rampage 4E,i7 3930k @ 4400 ghz, Asus gtx 580dcu11 sli @ 897 core,16gb Gskill ripjaw z @ 2133mhz, Koolance wc blocks & RP-452X2 res, Corsair AX1200i psu,XSPC H1 Cube+ case & rads,Intel ssd, 4 x 2tb
|
| Tue Nov 13, 2012 5:27 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
Welcome to the ladder madmic2 and great score mate!!
Ps: sorry for the late response...
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:00 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 19th May, 2004 Posts: 1773
|
New rig i’ve just put together. Gave me a bit of a woody so i thought i share the result. Bait please delete my old score and name (position 19) and replace with this. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4979239P16348 - I7 3770k @ 4.4 - 16Gb DDR3-1866 Corsair Dominator Platinum - SLI GTX 680 TOP Edition 1100/1500. Haven’t had the time to oc the chip beyond this point, but boy does it get hot. Running a corsair H100, which isn’t doing too badly for an out of the box cooler. There’s still plenty of potential though in both the CPU and GPU so when I find the time ill push them some more.
|
| Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:53 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
Great score Majic and Congrats on the new rig mate!!
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:08 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 27th October, 2007 Posts: 1712
|
Bump 4 thread. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5380490P13519-i7950 @4.07, 6gb DDR3@2000mhz, EVGA GTX 690(power+135,gpu+175,mem+150)
_________________ Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.
|
| Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:13 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 24th December, 2004 Posts: 4903
|
Not bad for the 690, I find the old i7's are just starting to show their age.
I'm currently running the 920 @ 4.2 and it necks the cards, changed to 3930k and the frames shot up. Latency was less as well.
Good score.
_________________
Magnum STH-10, Rampage 4 Extreme, 3930k@4.6 @1.376v, Tri-SLI EVGA 4GB 680s@1228/3350 @1.212v
12GB G.Skill 2400Mhz, Neutron GTX 240GB, SS 1200W Gold, SS 450W, Custom Loop WC, Dual 560 rads.
|
| Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:44 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 27th October, 2007 Posts: 1712
|
Yeah the i7 is a bit of an old faithful, the 690 is the last hurrah for this setup.
_________________ Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.
|
| Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:16 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
Cool nings, where did you get your 690 from? Here's my 3d mark so you can see how much a newer CPU effects the 690. Haven't done any serious overclocking on this rig still though. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4798641
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:59 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 27th October, 2007 Posts: 1712
|
690,waterblock and backing plate come from frozen cpu,about the same price as just a 690 on its own here. New cpu, mobo, ram would be nice, I think I'd go 6 core but I just bought a new car so I'll be holding off on that until prices come down a bit. Nice score bro.
_________________ Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:24 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
Pretty good price wise considering how overpriced they are in aus. I was waiting for frozen cpu to come back into stock ages ago but they took too long so I got one from the states on ebay. How do you find the backing plate? Does it make it much hotter?
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:27 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 27th October, 2007 Posts: 1712
|
Dunno about hotter just stops the card from putting weight onto the mobo and looks cool. My temps don't go over 47 under load and if the air cons on (room about 26) not over 40. How hot under air?
_________________ Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:33 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 24th December, 2004 Posts: 4903
|
A good match for the 690 would the the 3930k. Unlock CPU + Quad channel DDR + Full 40 lanes of PCI-E. (Suppose 40 lanes isn't an issue unless you were planning Quad-SLI in the future). Early this coming year they are expected to release an Ivy-Bridge-E, running off either the X78 or something very similar. This will result in an Ivy-Bridge as powerful as the 3930k, but with full PCI-E 3.0 support, doubling your lane bandwidth.
Got my 680's about $250 EACH cheaper than what's available in Aus. Could buy a 690 just in the money I saved by purchasing overseas.
The backplate was supposed to help spread the heat from the memory chips on that side of the card, as well as look cool. The heat was going to be there, backplate or not, best to retain it unless there was a very good reason not to.
_________________
Magnum STH-10, Rampage 4 Extreme, 3930k@4.6 @1.376v, Tri-SLI EVGA 4GB 680s@1228/3350 @1.212v
12GB G.Skill 2400Mhz, Neutron GTX 240GB, SS 1200W Gold, SS 450W, Custom Loop WC, Dual 560 rads.
Last edited by ph33x on Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:58 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 6th September, 2006 Posts: 3223
|
Aw yeah, I can't even fit a backplate into my rig.. But yeah, I haven't run any temp monitors nings so I wouldn't be able to answer haha.
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:05 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
I find that with the 600 series the temps increase from overclocking is almost nonexistent.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:11 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 24th December, 2004 Posts: 4903
|
Probably cause you can't up the volts past like 1.113 or whatever the limit is. Volts generate far more heat than clocks in my experience. It is of my opinion that the 6xx series was severely underclocked and undervolted. Gives them an easy run selling the 7xx which is supposed to be same arch, higher clocks.
Volt unlocked cards like the Classy running 1.3 volts+ get damn hot.
_________________
Magnum STH-10, Rampage 4 Extreme, 3930k@4.6 @1.376v, Tri-SLI EVGA 4GB 680s@1228/3350 @1.212v
12GB G.Skill 2400Mhz, Neutron GTX 240GB, SS 1200W Gold, SS 450W, Custom Loop WC, Dual 560 rads.
|
| Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:38 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 5th June, 2004 Posts: 8658
|
You know what.. I wonder if anyone is going to design an 'all in one' GPU water cooler in the same way that CPU coolers (kuhler etc) are these day.
|
| Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:49 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:24 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 5th June, 2004 Posts: 8658
|
Well there you go.
|
| Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:30 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 28th May, 2007 Posts: 1833
|
Sorry about the delay guys, updated 
_________________ System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ
|
| Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:03 am |
|
 |
|
Joined: 15th July, 2011 Posts: 17
|
Hi, I finally decided to upgrade my rig. Heres what I got: Score: P9317 i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz Asus Gtx680 @1006 Mhz/1058 Mhz Boost clock. Stock http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5505413
|
| Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:13 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 27th October, 2007 Posts: 1712
|
Very nice, adds 3000 to your last score, I'm pretty sure that means your games will now run better, I told you xeper was full of ****.
_________________ Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.
|
| Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:16 pm |
|
 |
|
Joined: 16th December, 2002 Posts: 4736
|
nings wrote: I'm pretty sure that means your games will now run better, I told you xeper was full of ****. This.
_________________
1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans
|
| Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:23 pm |
|
|