FUTUREMARK 3DMARK11 RANKING
----------------------------------------------------
3DMARK11 is a new DX11 benchmark application that measures graphic system performance.

Rules
- HWBOT tags no longer required to submit.
- Don't use multiple screen names.
- Only post scores belonging to you.
- A valid Futuremark ORB compare url or screenshot is compulsory!!
- Any cheating will result instant score removal.
- Default resolution and PERFORMANCE preset.

Guidelines
- Format your score as follows: score - system description
- Format processor ID, i5 750 is ok, 750 is too short.
- Format processor overclock, xx @ 2850Mhz or xx @ 2.85Ghz.
- Format videocard ID and speed, Gigabyte 9800 GTX @ 675/1000 Mhz or 9800 GTX @ 675/1000.
- Allowed score formats: 12345 or P12345


3Dmark11 Futuremark link
Note: File size is 282MB and is not hosted by GameArena, therefore downloading from link will count towards your monthly quota!!!


Bring on your best scores and Good Luck


^^^===***===^^^===***===^^^- 3DMARK11 TOP 50-^^^===***===^^^===***===^^^


1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans (GPU's @ 1178mhz, +150 memory)

2. ph33x - P23219 - i7 3930k @ 4.8 GHz - Rampage IV Extreme - 12GB RipJaw-X 2400 CL10 - Tri SLI EVGA GTX680 4GB Power 138% - GPU Clock Offset +125MHz - Mem +350Mhz

3. GpuJoe - P20159 - i7 980x @ 4.6 GHz - Rampage III Extreme - 12GB Corsair 1600 - Tri SLI EVGA GTX680 power 130% - GPU Clock Offset +118MHz - Mem +430Mhz

4. iryont - P18217 - i7-3930k @ 5GHz - Asus Rampage IV Extreme - 24GB Kingston HyperX 9-9-9-27 1600MHz - GTX 590 Quad-SLI @ 700/1750MHz

5. smokin_mitch - P16725 - i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz, 16gb 2133Mhz ram, GTX 680 SLI (gpu1 +125 power, +150 GPU, +500 MEM / gpu2 +125 power, +130 GPU, +500 MEM )

6. Majic - P16348 - I7 3770k @ 4.4 - 16Gb DDR3-1866 Corsair Dominator Platinum - SLI GTX 680 TOP Edition 1100/1500.

7. Bait - P15919 - i7 3820 @ 4.3GHz - GA-X79UD3 - 8GB Gskill 8-8-8-24-1T 1600MHz - SLI Gigabyte GTX670 @ 1150/6400MHz

8. Vukodlak - P15731 - Intel Core i7-3770k @ 4.1 - 32gb DDR3-2400 G.Skill Trident - SLI Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Stock

9. Nings - P13519 - i7 950 @4.07, 6gb DDR3@2000mhz, EVGA GTX 690 (power+135,gpu+175,mem+150)

10. madmic2 - P13480 - i7 3930k @4400,sli580gtx dcu11 @897mhz,re4,16gb ripgaw z,xspc case, lcs

11. dasa - P12124 - i7 2600K@5GHz - 2X SLI GTX480@925/2113

12. Gung-ho - P11870 - 2600k @ 4.5GHz / 8gb G.Skill RipJaws X @ 2133Mhz (11-11-11-30-1N) / SLI GTX 480 @ 850/1700/1848MHz

13. R_Type - P11632 - i7 3930k@4.7GHz, ASUS GTX680 DirectCU II TOP 2GB, 16GB DDR31600 RAM

14. Flippy-tw - P11259 - i7 2600k @3.9ghz, 16gb @1600, 2 X gtx 580 3gb

15. qc777 - p10955 - core i7 920 @ 4ghz, 6gb kingston ram @ 1600, 2 x evga gtx 570 @ 823 / 1646 ram @ 1900

16. DJSMILES - P10319 - I7 975x @ 3779 MHz, 2 way SLi GTX 570 @ core clock 850 MHz / 2000 MHz

17. Pablitos Way - P10239 - Core I5 2500K @ 4.5Ghz, Gigabyte GTX680 2GB @ power target 115%, GPU clock offset +150Mhz, MEM clock offset +500mhz

18. Fencer - P9921 - i7 3770k @ stock - Gigabyte GTX680 @ stock

19. oddnutz - P9701 - Core I5 2500K @ 4.5Ghz, Gigabyte GTX670 2GB @ power target 112%, GPU clock offset +135Mhz, MEM clock offset +700mhz

20. Schnappi - P9655 - i7 970@3.2 Ghz- 6970x2 880Mhz

21. medawky - P9537 - i7-2600k @4ghz + 680GTX 4gb stock

22. Incubus - P9402 - i7 2600@4.2ghz - GTX560ti-SLI@950mhz

23. Rushy - P9317 - i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz - Asus Gtx680 @1006 Mhz/1058 Mhz Boost clock. Stock

24. Frazer C83 - P8753 - X6 1090T @ 3.9GHz | NB 2.8Ghz - CrossfireX HD 6950 Overclocked 900 | 1400

25. Witchdoctor - P8168 - i7 920 C0 @ 4.0GHz - 2 * HD6870 @ 950/1150

26. Kezzbot - P8075 - Intel 920 @ 2.6Ghz - 6 gig DDR3 - 2x AMD 6950 stock

27. Taipan - P7977 - i7 920 C0 @ 3.8GHz - HIS HD5970 @ 900/1200

28. Mack - P6666 - i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz - Gigabyte GTX580 Stock - Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - Noctua NH-D14

29. ruleofbookz - P6293 - i7 920 @ Stock - GTX 580 @ Stock - 6GB Kingston cas9 @ 1333MHz

30. Goliathus - P6180 -- i7 920 @ 4Ghz HT ON -- HD6970 @ 950/5800 -- 6GB 1600Mhz -- ASUS P6T DELUXE V2

31. madaz_rx8 - P5796 - i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz @ 1.32v gfx 6950 @ 950mhz/1350mhz

32. ASASN - P5402 - Q9450 @ 3.55ghz - MSI GTX 560 Ti HAWK @ 1040/2100

33. Couger - P5307 - I7 920 @ 3.5 ghz-6 gig ddr3 triple chan-stock gigabyte gtx570

34. Bazroon - P5173 3DMarks - -i7 2600k @ 3.8ghz (stock is 3.4ghz), 8gb ddr3, hd6970 @ 800/1250.

35. 762x51 - P4995 - Q9550 @ 3.4ghz - 6G DDR2 - ATI HD6970

36. Flippy-tw - P4953 - Q9550 @3.2ghz - Gigabyte GTX 570 stock

37. Gir - P4866 - AMD Phenom2 1100T @ 3.7ghz, Sapphire Radeon 6970 @ Stock

38. nothardcore - P4033 - Phenom x6 @ 3.3GHz - 8GB Corsair 9-9-9-24 1600MHz - Gigabyte GTX560 1GB @ 830/2004MHz

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

I'll have a go lol.

P3876 – Core i5 @ 4GHz – Gigabyte GTX460 1GB @ 825/1650/2000MHz

Compare URL = http://3dmark.com/3dm11/52561

P3935 - Q9450 @ 3.52ghz - Gigabyte 6850 @ 900/1075

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/41291

She's got more to give, still running stock volts on the 6850.

Well done mate Number one spot is yours lol.

Not fair...I was king of the ladder for .3 seconds...bugger!!

I really could not be bothered overclocking. So everything is stock

P6401 - i7 920 C0 @ Stock - HIS HD5970 @ Stock

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/69369

P4343-Q9550 @ 3400ghz-PC 5870 @ 890/1290


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/69320

Nice one guys certainly seems ATI can chew this benchie up....I protest, rigged, its a trap!! lol.

P3380

Core2 Quad @ 3ghz, 5850 stock.


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/71470


TheBait, can u do me a favor mate. Can u do another run with your CPU @ 3ghz just like mine. I just wanted to see the difference between my system and yours, with the same CPU speeds.

Cheers

the app refuses to install on my rig, u can choose language and it opens a window preparing to install then nothing - i have 64bit XP OS so maybe it doesn't like 64bit

I'm guessing the bench is DX11 only?

Hey. I gave overclocking my PC ago and got a new score

P7977 - i7 920 C0 @ 3.8GHz - HIS HD5970 @ 900/1200

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/76083

So that is a 24.6% increase when I overclock

I could probably overclock the CPU to over 4GHz and the GPU to atleast 930/1210 with a little more voltage in order to get over 8000, but I am not that dedicated. I am sure Jonny5 would be happy to break the 8000 or even 9000 mark for me and Kanguru the 10,000 mark if he is still around

Shouldn't be a problem, just a bit busy ATM though
Still a great score at only 3GHz!!


Yeah sorry, Dogg's correct it's DX11.


Very impressive update
Yeah certainly hoping the others will be inspired and participate....we love competition lol.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/41450

P4375 3DMarks

Take that gung ho!

i7 950 @ 3.6GHz - HIS HD5870 @ 900/1200

Haha, sweet score Mack

Funny thing is I really thought it would have scored higher due to the 90000Mhz core and 130000Mhz mem clock lol

Yeah.

I think my ram was bottlenecking it.

Here you go Medawky, score hasn't drop much at all.

ProcessorIntel Core i5 Processor I5-750
Processor clock 3000 MHz
Physical / logical processors 1 / 4
Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Core clock 825 MHz
Memory clock 2000 MHz
Module 1 2048 MB G.Skill 9 @ 667 MHz
Module 2 2048 MB G.Skill 9 @ 667 MHz

Detailed scores 3DMark Score P3808
Graphics score 3606
Physics Score 5966 <biggest hit was here>
Combined Score 3394
GraphicsTest1 16.45 FPS
GraphicsTest2 17.05 FPS
GraphicsTest3 22.19 FPS
GraphicsTest4 11.04 FPS
PhysicsTest 18.94 FPS
CombinedTest 15.79 FPS

Here is a d/l link from Node for the file if you would rather download it from an Australian source.

http://games.on.net/file/38862/3DMark_1 ... or_Windows

I will give it a run when my congested internet pulls the finger out.

I was wondering when you might appear, now this is your chance to flog me in at least one benchie lol

Also thanks for the link Fluffy

Are you a bit gutted that Futuremark doesn't bloat Nvidia scores up anymore ?

P4295

Q9400 @ 3.40GHz - Club3D HD5870 @ 900/1200

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/140179

Wonder where all the heavy weights are? I was not expecting to have 1st place this long.

Where is Jonny5, Himmler, Blaise and Kanguru these days.

I just checked out the old benchmark thread and I didn't know I managed to overclock my card to 945/1300. Jesus should of written down how I managed that.

Thanks The_Bait, yeah suprisingly, the score remains high, only a drop of 100 pts for 1ghz of CPU speed. This is a good thing though, cos the score is a good representation of gaming power, as the GPU is the main driver @ 1080p res or higher, provided that the CPU is fast enough to begin with.

Diluted, what motherboard do u use? Im still pumping my first gen 965p hehe.

Medawky - I have an ASUS P5Q-Pro, has been a solid board for a couple of years now.

I run the test however it crashes (Windows has experienced an error...) at the beginning of the CPU Physics test. Every other benchmark I've ran, from Sandra, previous 3dmarks, Pcmark, Superpi and Prime95 are stable and work. Also games that I've benchmarked like Crysis, F1 and AvsP run fine too.

I might drop the overclock a few MHz and see if it makes a difference.

Diluted, yeah thats a P45 chipset i beleive, much improved since the 965p. After 965, they had the P35, then came yours, the P45. That and the 5870 helps explains the great score difference hehe. Core 2 Quad CPUs are still damn powerful.

Johnny5 is here. Waiting for next graphics driver.

This one is not getting good performance at all for 3dmark11. Painful.

10.11 cap4 has a release note, improve crossfire performance for 3dmark11.

Yeah the P45 chipset is notorious for stability & overclocking, I have had mine running since july 08 with not one problem. Other users on here have had nothing but trouble with the X48 chipset which was meant to be "supreme" in it's day.

Why? Just run everything at stock and you will probably still get first place

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/159020

There is something wrong with the drivers and crossfire, as usual.
GraphicsTest4 16.81 FPS, just over 15fps, makes me lol.
Going back to older drivers will get my crossfire working, but i am sick and tired of it. I just take what the driver can deliver. Without juggling drivers my 2nd 5970 is useless.

P6421

i7980x @ 4.48GHz - xfx be 5970x2, stock clocks

wow

I am not sure how the hell that works considering I have the same card as you but minus 1 and you have a much more powerful CPU that is overclocked beyond mine.

I guess this driver problem only affects 4 x GPU crossfire

I disabled crossfire, got a better score. 10.5 and earlier drivers use all GPU's. Some later ones as well, which ones are good, i cant keep track of. Driver is still stuffed for my config. Pray for 10.12

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/159525

P6721

i7980x @ 4.48GHz - xfx be 5970x2, stock clocks

This is something ATI advertises as working, but it hasn't worked since a driver release 6 months ago. The old drivers had different bugs also. Very bad people ATI, really hate them.

lol I got no problems

Yeah mate it's a big slap around the balls with a wet fish lol

But seriously, it's good to see a bench that actually has uniformity and shows the raw power of each GPU with little cpu dependence

Now if a few more Nvidia users would submit to the ladder it should make for a interesting comparison.

Well my issue is not O/C issue, the error i get is:

Workload work failed with error message: window_focus_lost: Keyboard focus lost

Official reply:

Would imply that some other program stole focus (in essence, tried to draw something on the screen on top of the benchmark, which would invalidate the score). Common culprits include email programs that pop up "you have new mail" messages or antivirus programs popping up warnings etc.

Few people have tried this with no luck, then later they respond and say:

No this thread is not dead but at this point I have no new instructions what to try to prevent lost focus.

Source

Lol if your balls were getting some fish, then that sounds normal to me

Are you running this bench with no background processes ?

I did a little more forum hunting and this is what got it to work:

Under the HELP tab, i unticked "scan SystemInfo" and it the benchmark work. Although i got some pop-up error message when it was loading the results online (Your result has the following problem(s) and will not be shown for example on leaderboards: Graphics card is not recognized, Graphics driver is not approved. Im running 10.10 ATi):

3DMark Score
P4117
Graphics score
3971
Physics Score
5204
Combined Score
3970
GraphicsTest1
19.07 FPS
GraphicsTest2
19.53 FPS
GraphicsTest3
24.3 FPS
GraphicsTest4
11.51 FPS
PhysicsTest
16.52 FPS
CombinedTest
18.47 FPS

SPECS:
Q9650 @ 4.1GHz - 4GB RAM - ATi 6870 stock

catalyst 10.4 ftw. Check out my first 3 graphic test averages, smokin.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/172341

P11848

i7980x @ 4.48GHz - xfx be 5970x2 @ 900/1300

Wow!!!! Thats blown me away, congrat's that's one solid score johnny

All I can say now is "Come on Himmler, where are you?" lol, I really gotta see what 3 greens can do against the red menace

Wonder if SLI scales better than CF?

Bait you can delete my score if you want, had issues with the card so I ended up getting a refund and what's even better is the new msi brand 6850 oc edition does the exact same thing. Yes I know it screams that its my pc and not the card but after dropping the 6850s mem speed to 900 I don't have any problems at all. From what I've read there's issues regarding either the mems voltage and/or the mems temp itself, I'm going to stick with the card for now hoping that drivers or something will fix it but I tell ya what I seriously doubt I'd ever get another ati card.

B4 the psu q's start, I'm running a shaw 500w...........

I'm joking I'M JOKING its an old Thermaltake 750w Toughpower W0116.

Nah, Its all good ASASN, your score is still valid even if your hardware has changed slightly now

Bummer about the problems though, don't wanna start a war here but if I was to average out all the problems I've encounted over the years regarding Nvidia vs ATI issuses, I believe ATI based machines would be leading the list
Of course in saying that, you have to remember I only deal with people that have problems and so, don't hear all the probable success stories.....

Does it make me bias, bloody oath, but this is only "my perspective", right or wrong lol

/where's my flame suit!!!!!! haha

Edit: just noticed the NDA has been lifted for the 69xx series, time for some reading....

Ok, my official score:

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/194087

QX9650 @ 4.1GHz - 4GB RAM DDR2 1066 - ATi HD 6870 1GB @ 980/1250

3DMark Score - P4466
Graphics score - 4358
Physics Score - 5178
Combined Score - 4382
GraphicsTest1 - 21.02 FPS
GraphicsTest2 - 21.49 FPS
GraphicsTest3 - 26.77 FPS
GraphicsTest4 - 12.56 FPS
PhysicsTest - 16.44 FPS
CombinedTest - 20.38 FPS

Very nice score R-Type

Looks like ATI are the dominating force with this bench where are all the green team users? Rats from a sinking ship syndrome lol....

Hope I don't have to go out and buy a GTX580

Just released patch

PATCH v1.0 to v1.1

New Catalysts + 3DM11 Patch + Overclocking CPU and ATI Overdrive

http://bit.ly/gIXAwO

Score:
P4506 3DMarks
i7950 @ 3.8ghz* - Gigabyte HD5870 @ 900/1200

*3dmark reports it at 3.6 and gigabyte easy tuner reports it at 3.6 too, there must be a multiplier that cranks it to 3.8 in actual speed.

Also, my 5870 is a Gigabyte not HIS lol. HIS was my old x1950xtx card.

Certainly nothing wrong with that updated score Mack, 3rd on the ladder

That is good enough for a bronze medal...but we're all out, so please feel free to fabricate your own lol

Edit: This green vs red war brings out the worst in me, Mawhahaha.....

Nitro, wheres ur test run? No i7-860 scores yet.

Come on peoples!!!, even with lower scores you're guaranteed a place on the ladder

Really need some variety lol.

Hehe good old HIS. I have my old HIS X1950XTX sitting behind me in the cupboard. I remember when I moved from a 9200SE to the X1950XTX I thought WOW this card is MASSIVE. I now own a HIS HD5970 the current largest card

3 slot cards will probably become common place one day

Never had a HIS card fail on me.