If aids has been cured, why are you still here? No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
If aids has been cured, why are you still here? No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
If aids has been cured, why are you still here? No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
Sorry for speaking science with you. Go ask one of your internet sub masters to explain it to you and tell you how to respond to it. You internet sheeple
No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
It was a bone marrow transplant.
Embryonic stems cells come from IVF or abortion clinic eggs that are just going to be disposed of. They don't come from fetuses. They can be used to create any other cell, and have the potential to treat innumerable ailments and diseases. At 5 days a fertilised isn't a human, it's a blastocyst.
Just another example of religious dogma, misinformation, and disinformation, slowing human progress at the expense of the countless millions of suffering who could benefit from such research.
No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
It was a bone marrow transplant.
Embryonic stems cells come from IVF or abortion clinic eggs that are just going to be disposed of. They don't come from fetuses. They can be used to create any other cell, and have the potential to treat innumerable ailments and diseases. At 5 days a fertilised isn't a human, it's a blastocyst.
Just another example of religious dogma, misinformation, and disinformation, slowing human progress at the expense of the countless millions of suffering who could benefit from such research.
. His physician was able to treat his leukemia with a stem-cell transplant from a person who was born with a genetic mutation causing immunity to HIV infection.
cherocha wrote:
Embryonic stems cells come from IVF or abortion clinic eggs that are just going to be disposed of. They don't come from fetuses. They can be used to create any other cell, and have the potential to treat innumerable ailments and diseases. At 5 days a fertilised isn't a human, it's a blastocyst.
Quote:
Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests, are derived from embryos. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—
And lol @abortion clinic eggs
cherocha wrote:
Just another example of religious dogma, misinformation, and disinformation, slowing human progress at the expense of the countless millions of suffering who could benefit from such research.
Funny how science turns into dogma the moment it doesn't support someones ideals. Every single major break through with stem cells has come through adult stem cells or "self stem cells" Usualy they would have tried baby cells first. But they failed. either collapsing or causing tumors. Baby stem cells are useless. Medical researchers can't get private investors to fund them. Thats why many pushed hard to get embryomic publicaly funded. The U.S government is now the biggest investor in embryonic stem cell research. So no. millions are not suffering. The only thing embryonic stem has been useful for is giving baby killers some sort of scienctific support in their baby killing orgies. Its like they go " We must kill this kid so we can cure this fat **** of heart diesease" When in fact it wont cure them.
This is pretty much what I think of all religious people. **** off wulfgang.
No. Now what? Don't you feel sad now that you know your influence in here is zero? If only you kept your mouth shut you could have deluded yourself longer, Then you wouldn't have to fight the urge to neck yourself
If aids has been cured, why are you still here? No seriously. I notice in the link that the only other person to be cured of aids was done so by using adult stem cells. More proof that embroyonic stem cells are not only dangerous and uselss. They are a needless waste of human life.
. His physician was able to treat his leukemia with a stem-cell transplant from a person who was born with a genetic mutation causing immunity to HIV infection.
Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests, are derived from embryos. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—
Quote:
Embryonic stem cells are grown from cells found in the embryo when it is just a few days old. In humans, mice and other mammals, the embryo is a ball of approximately 100 cells at this stage. It is known as a blastocyst
My mistake, was thinking of fetal stem cells. Still, hate to see junk go to waste.
Quote:
Cells with the potential to form embryonic stem cells in a lab dish only exist in these very young, four to five day old blastocysts. They are a fleeting cell type that disappears after that point in time. A common misconception is that the cells can come from older embryos or from aborted fetuses, which is in fact not possible.
Funny how science turns into dogma the moment it doesn't support someones ideals. Every single major break through with stem cells has come through adult stem cells or "self stem cells" Usualy they would have tried baby cells first. But they failed. either collapsing or causing tumors. Baby stem cells are useless. Medical researchers can't get private investors to fund them. Thats why many pushed hard to get embryomic publicaly funded. The U.S government is now the biggest investor in embryonic stem cell research. So no. millions are not suffering. The only thing embryonic stem has been useful for is giving baby killers some sort of scienctific support in their baby killing orgies. Its like they go " We must kill this kid so we can cure this fat **** of heart diesease" When in fact it wont cure them.
They don't use baby stem cells. An embryo is not a baby, it's a scrap of cells.
Cancer, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, growing organs, neurological disorders, blood and immune-system related genetic diseases, blindness, and spinal cord injuries. Millions upon millions upon millions.
Embryonic stems cells differ from adult stems cells in that they can replicate indefinately. They can also produce any cell type found in the body, adult stem cells cannot.
To denote something as "useless" would suggest that it has actually been used, which embryonic stems cells have not, at least not with humans. In trials with rats that had spinal cord injuries however, they showed greatly improved locomotor recovery. I'd say that's pretty useful. http://www.jneurosci.org/content/25/19/4694
As for you Wulfgang, I don't believe you are serious.
If you are though, how do you feel about the fact that many Bio Ethics experts consider even a newborn child to be lacking the necessary criteria to be classed as an actual person and that newborn abortion is just as ethical as any other kind of abortion?
Where do you draw the line on cancelling a potential life? because as far as I'm concerned, unless you pray to god for forgiveness after whacking off or using contraception, you're a hypocrite.
Once again though I think it's pretty obvious you are trolling and don't actually believe any of this nonsense you seem so keen to share with us, but I'll give you credit for stimulating discussion.
As for you Wulfgang, I don't believe you are serious.
If you are though, how do you feel about the fact that many Bio Ethics experts consider even a newborn child to be lacking the necessary criteria to be classed as an actual person and that newborn abortion is just as ethical as any other kind of abortion?
Where do you draw the line on cancelling a potential life? because as far as I'm concerned, unless you pray to god for forgiveness after whacking off or using contraception, you're a hypocrite.
Once again though I think it's pretty obvious you are trolling and don't actually believe any of this nonsense you seem so keen to share with us, but I'll give you credit for stimulating discussion.
just say dude what with carl sagan i also like this one
i have a pocket knife and a sword the sword they dont have names but leg slayer would be a better name
If you pulled out a pocket knife at comicon for him to sign, they would throw you the **** out and probably call the police if you can't convince them you were after a signature.
But because you look like a serial killer, they will hold you down till the police arrive and arrest you, then you will be in jail for the next 6 years for attempted murder.
i have a pocket knife and a sword the sword they dont have names but leg slayer would be a better name
If you pulled out a pocket knife at comicon for him to sign, they would throw you the **** out and probably call the police if you can't convince them you were after a signature.
But because you look like a serial killer, they will hold you down till the police arrive and arrest you, then you will be in jail for the next 6 years for attempted murder.
i was thinking something like that might happen so i will ask if i can get it signed i also need a pen which will stay on my knife
Take your sword in there, just buy a sheath and shove it down the back of your shirt and walk past security.
i have a steel scabbard i could just cosplay as someone and use it as a prop
It wont work man, even the props will be inspected and if you stash it in a bag and they ask to look inside the bag and you say no they will refuse entry until you get rid of the bag. Anything in plain sight they will pull you up on but if its hidden on your body you can walk on through because of privacy.
_________________ bieltanman - "your a sheep who needs a sheaperd im a lion hunter of sheep and dosent need a sheapard"
Take your sword in there, just buy a sheath and shove it down the back of your shirt and walk past security.
i have a steel scabbard i could just cosplay as someone and use it as a prop
It wont work man, even the props will be inspected and if you stash it in a bag and they ask to look inside the bag and you say no they will refuse entry until you get rid of the bag. Anything in plain sight they will pull you up on but if its hidden on your body you can walk on through because of privacy.
i dident think they would mind if it was a prop well being a deadily wepon do you have experince with this
View Control Panel
Search
