Main content
Games Shop

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 475 posts ] 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
apparently it's happening.

JJ Abrams to direct. Dunno if he's much goodly. Done some alright producer stuff - Cloverfield, Super 8, Star Trek (that coming-of-age action movie where they're all punk kids).

sorry, all current news links look ****. I'm just personal friends with Georgie boy. Any messages for him (not about Jar Jar)?

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:32 am
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
possible spoiler here:


wasn't the emperor a clone or something?

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:36 am
GameArena Staff
User avatar

Joined: 13th April, 2003
Posts: 11067
tell him he sucks and he ruined indy

_________________
Current front runner for worst game of the year - The War Z


Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:39 am
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
Image

might've been trolled :(

or not... a joke about him producing star trek and star wars eh. I don't think so quick in the morning.

and No. I liked indy 4. Especially the rape scene - it was very convincing.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:40 am
User avatar

Joined: 16th December, 2002
Posts: 4723
Hey Rooney you gonna get the Xbox surface?

_________________

1. Audi - P24062 - 3930k @ 4.8, 16gb ddr3 @ 1600mhz, 2x GTX Titans


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:20 am
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
star trek is way better than star wars enterprise could smash any ship from starwars live long and may the force be with you engage its a trap go to red alert

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:29 am
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
Image

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:38 am
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
Rooney wrote:
possible spoiler here:


wasn't the emperor a clone or something?


No after it is suppose to be Thrawn and his cronies taking over so its more imperials rather then dark jedi ruling.

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:40 am
User avatar

Joined: 4th September, 2007
Posts: 2277
bieltanman wrote:
star trek is way better than star wars enterprise could smash any ship from starwars live long and may the force be with you engage its a trap go to red alert

Are you serious?
If given a choice. What world or dimension would you rather live in beets A starwars dimension or a star trek one?


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:52 am
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
wulfgang wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
star trek is way better than star wars enterprise could smash any ship from starwars live long and may the force be with you engage its a trap go to red alert

Are you serious?
If given a choice. What world or dimension would you rather live in beets A starwars dimension or a star trek one?


he likes star trek better because they have a holodeck and he can make a holodeck yugioh tournament where he wins and gets all the pussy at the end.

still leaves the holodeck a virgin but theres always tomorrow!

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:57 am
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
star trek isn't even realistic.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:07 am
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
i would %100 choose star trek cus they are explorers and they like science and have dardy ships that go fast and meet new races and i would have the mega future enterprise it like 1 shots the other ship
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xut_OMlAVyY[/youtube]

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:08 am
User avatar

Joined: 26th October, 2007
Posts: 12623
JJ Abrams did battlestar

blood n chrome i watched recently it was ok

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:30 am
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
Audi wrote:
Hey Rooney you gonna get the Xbox surface?


wow that looks awqesome. Just pre-ordered.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:13 pm
User avatar

Joined: 31st July, 2012
Posts: 1273
bieltanman wrote:
i would %100 choose star trek cus they are explorers and they like science and have dardy ships that go fast and meet new races and i would have the mega future enterprise it like 1 shots the other ship
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xut_OMlAVyY[/youtube]


Star Wars has way faster ships and the technology is way way ahead of the federaton.

_________________
3/10


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:14 pm
User avatar

Joined: 26th October, 2007
Posts: 12623
Image

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:18 pm
User avatar

Joined: 17th September, 2002
Posts: 2840
Location: Perth
bieltanman wrote:
i would %100 choose star trek cus they are explorers and they like science and have dardy ships that go fast and meet new races and i would have the mega future enterprise it like 1 shots the other ship


typical Vman. Star wars has many uses. Like when you're doin' it doggy and you stick your thumb in and say 'we just lost the main rear deflector shield' and then she giggles and you can say the force is strong with this one.

Or if she says front only you can say 'it's a trap!' or ... yeah the list goes on.

Btw there's a new internet rule: Never admit you're a virgin - it sticks like jizz to an eyeball.

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:19 pm
User avatar

Joined: 4th September, 2007
Posts: 2277
bieltanman wrote:
i would %100 choose star trek cus they are explorers and they like science and have dardy ships that go fast and meet new races and i would have the mega future enterprise it like 1 shots the other ship
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xut_OMlAVyY[/youtube]

That is true. But the same applies to star wars. I would rather be in starwars world.
Why? Because in star trek. It seems only the best of the best get into space. You have to go through a rigorous selection process. I bet you would have to have some phd just to mop the floors. Face it. People like you and the others wouldn't get off the planet. I might.
But in starwars, there is more freedom. Just go buy a ship and off you go. Even the empire doesn't hold you back. I think. Starwars is like the old wild west and star trek is like communist russia


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:24 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
star trek dosent have a currency for the federation there isnt money and **** and so many peps are in the federation it isnt that hard
Quote:
Star Wars has way faster ships and the technology is way way ahead of the federaton.

this is wrong star trek kicks the **** out of star wars. in star wars they use lasers which is a very primitive form of phaser in several eps of tng and voy ships have had lasers and firing on there sheilds with no effect what so ever startrek has transporters replacitators cloaking devices and not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:54 pm

Joined: 28th June, 2012
Posts: 10
Star Wars has lightsabers. Star Trek has baclavs or whatever those Klingon pieces of crap are called. Is there really any question which is better?


Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:47 pm
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
star trek has aliens which beiltan wants to find before everyone else so they wont know his a neckbeard virgin

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:48 pm
User avatar

Joined: 26th October, 2007
Posts: 12623
it better be on the next ep of this show

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:01 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
shagwa wrote:
Star Wars has lightsabers. Star Trek has baclavs or whatever those Klingon pieces of crap are called. Is there really any question which is better?

star trek has wide mode on phaser it can instally kill in a large area

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:20 pm

Joined: 24th September, 2003
Posts: 131
Yay !!! Star Wars with shaky cam and overdone lens flare!! Just what I wanted!!!

Next they will announce that the story centers around a planet of mice led by Mickey and Minnie that help the rebels topple the evil empire.

Seriously **** Abrams, **** Disney and **** any Star Wars movie that is not episode IV, V or VI .


Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:28 pm
User avatar

Joined: 4th September, 2007
Posts: 2277
bieltanman wrote:
not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

Whats the use of having lasers then?


Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:30 pm
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
wulfgang wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

Whats the use of having lasers then?


Well for a start its only the tie fighters that dont have shields because they have speed instead which star trek doesnt have. you could easily hit them with the death star laser because they will sit still raise shields and try be nice.

Star wars has targetting computer but beiltans got no **** clue as the whole story is basically luke turns his targetting computer off and uses the force. You must be **** thick in the head if you didn't notice it.

3rdly. The shields in both run off energy and deplete if you shoot them. Given that star wars has ion cannons which shut shields down quicker then the usual lasers both sides use the shields on the star trek nubs will drain quicker and as the life systems etc are based off energy which the ion cannons drain and the lack of breathing apparatus star trek nubs have they will die.

The whole primitive laser isnt primitive, its actually just what the rebellion basically scraps together as they are outlaws so they don't have top of the line stuff. But they do have torpedos that guide and follow which star trek doesnt.

Any more failure remarks beiltan?

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:36 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
wulfgang wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

Whats the use of having lasers then?

the lasers wont effect the enterprises sheilding at all nothing will happen if they open fire
as for toots just look at this site it has it all and star trek comes out on top
http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWhi2.html

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:13 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
TooTs wrote:
wulfgang wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

Whats the use of having lasers then?


Well for a start its only the tie fighters that dont have shields because they have speed instead which star trek doesnt have. you could easily hit them with the death star laser because they will sit still raise shields and try be nice.

Star wars has targetting computer but beiltans got no **** clue as the whole story is basically luke turns his targetting computer off and uses the force. You must be **** thick in the head if you didn't notice it.

3rdly. The shields in both run off energy and deplete if you shoot them. Given that star wars has ion cannons which shut shields down quicker then the usual lasers both sides use the shields on the star trek nubs will drain quicker and as the life systems etc are based off energy which the ion cannons drain and the lack of breathing apparatus star trek nubs have they will die.

The whole primitive laser isnt primitive, its actually just what the rebellion basically scraps together as they are outlaws so they don't have top of the line stuff. But they do have torpedos that guide and follow which star trek doesnt.

Any more failure remarks beiltan?

what i mean is that when the falcon is running away the empire always misses this dosent happen in star trek again go to this site http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWhi2.html they use references from all the eps

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:15 pm
User avatar

Joined: 31st July, 2012
Posts: 1273
TooTs wrote:
wulfgang wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
not all ships have sheilds in starwars but in star trek they do and they can withstand any form of laser fire. also in startrek they have targeting computers that means they can hit targets

Whats the use of having lasers then?


Well for a start its only the tie fighters that dont have shields because they have speed instead which star trek doesnt have. you could easily hit them with the death star laser because they will sit still raise shields and try be nice.

Star wars has targetting computer but beiltans got no **** clue as the whole story is basically luke turns his targetting computer off and uses the force. You must be **** thick in the head if you didn't notice it.

3rdly. The shields in both run off energy and deplete if you shoot them. Given that star wars has ion cannons which shut shields down quicker then the usual lasers both sides use the shields on the star trek nubs will drain quicker and as the life systems etc are based off energy which the ion cannons drain and the lack of breathing apparatus star trek nubs have they will die.

The whole primitive laser isnt primitive, its actually just what the rebellion basically scraps together as they are outlaws so they don't have top of the line stuff. But they do have torpedos that guide and follow which star trek doesnt.

Any more failure remarks beiltan?

Star Wars is just a massive space soap opera with spaceships that go "pew pew". The phaser banks would destroy 100 Tie Fighters before they even touched the shields.

_________________
3/10


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:17 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
Quote:
Star Wars has way faster ships and the technology is way way ahead of the federaton.

then you say

Quote:
The phaser banks would destroy 100 Tie Fighters before they even touched the shields.
what the hell are you on pick a side

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:26 pm
User avatar

Joined: 26th October, 2007
Posts: 12623

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:29 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSW-WeaponRange.html
this one is good

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:36 pm
User avatar

Joined: 24th May, 2012
Posts: 2419
Location: Adelaide
Star trek warp drive and federation impulse drives are just so slow compared to the vastly superior Imperial sub-light drives producing hyper drive.

Hyper drive.
Image

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:38 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
no it dosent the star trek impulse drive and ships are much more munilverable

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:44 pm
User avatar

Joined: 27th October, 2007
Posts: 1712
Maybe you should be hooking up with trekky chicks.

_________________
Consoles are still **** and people are still stupid.


Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:59 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
maby i should

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:01 pm
User avatar

Joined: 24th May, 2012
Posts: 2419
Location: Adelaide
Do they even have wookies in star treck?

_________________
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:02 pm
User avatar

Joined: 28th May, 2007
Posts: 1831
bieltanman wrote:
no it dosent the star trek impulse drive and ships are much more munilverable


Fail vman! Most Stars War ships are just as maneuverable and have hyper drives.

Watched Star trek something last week (nothing else on the idiot box) and it was going to take them 5 friggen years to cross some void and they were all going out of their minds with boredom.

Whats the point in maneuverable slow ships if you're travelling the far reaches of space?

StarWar = jedi's and epic battles....Star trek = days of our lives meets driving miss daisy lol.

_________________
System Tools CoreTemp GPUZ CPUZ


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:06 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
in sub light battles startrek ships are more muniravable but i dont think they ca go as fast past light speed with the expection of borg and the slipspace drive used on voyager they can go really really fast

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:11 pm
User avatar

Joined: 31st July, 2002
Posts: 2428
Bring on the Mass Effect movie. Will (hopefully) be good!

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:17 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
i want it so bad i really hope its good

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:20 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
anyone know that the deal with the mass effect movie is when is it comming

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:26 pm
User avatar

Joined: 19th April, 2009
Posts: 1633
Considering both are fiction does it really matter which franchise has better fictional ships than the other?


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:42 pm
User avatar

Joined: 21st August, 2010
Posts: 6595
Not at all, its what tryhard nerds do instead of follow footy.

CARN THE TRECKIES.
**** THAT YODA POOF RIGHT UP THE ARRRRRRSE.


Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:46 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
Noah wrote:
Considering both are fiction does it really matter which franchise has better fictional ships than the other?

yes it matters compleatly

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:18 pm
User avatar

Joined: 21st August, 2010
Posts: 6595
The enterprise kinda looks like an A-10.


Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:45 pm
User avatar

Joined: 21st August, 2010
Posts: 6595
bieltanman wrote:


delete the s of https


Sauce: Toots school of embedding you tube vids.


Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:49 pm
User avatar

Joined: 31st July, 2012
Posts: 1273
Bait wrote:
bieltanman wrote:
no it dosent the star trek impulse drive and ships are much more munilverable


Fail vman! Most Stars War ships are just as maneuverable and have hyper drives.

Watched Star trek something last week (nothing else on the idiot box) and it was going to take them 5 friggen years to cross some void and they were all going out of their minds with boredom.

Whats the point in maneuverable slow ships if you're travelling the far reaches of space?

StarWar = jedi's and epic battles....Star trek = days of our lives meets driving miss daisy lol.

That is what I thought until I watched 17 seasons of Star Trek.

_________________
3/10


Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:01 pm
User avatar

Joined: 12th May, 2004
Posts: 4990
bieltanman wrote:
what i mean is that when the falcon is running away the empire always misses this dosent happen in star trek again go to this site http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWhi2.html they use references from all the eps


you **** stupid? they get hit heaps. you should watch the movies then read some star trek fan boy site and form your own **** opinion before discussing you aspy mong.

_________________
I agree with the poster above me, Pc games are great.
Image


Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:07 pm
User avatar

Joined: 9th September, 2007
Posts: 7785
READ HIS INTRO HES ginvingnng both sides fair ness and only going off the facts anyway the enterprise would smoke any starwars ship before it got into range

_________________


Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:10 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 475 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Guest, Circa, Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], bieltanman and 7 guests


Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Based on design by STSoftware.